8351833: Unexpected increase in live nodes when splitting Phis through MergeMems in PhiNode::Ideal

Reviewed-by: chagedorn, rcastanedalo, kvn
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Lundén 2025-04-15 08:58:02 +00:00
parent b78378437c
commit 24be888d65
4 changed files with 94 additions and 17 deletions

View File

@ -2530,11 +2530,9 @@ Node *PhiNode::Ideal(PhaseGVN *phase, bool can_reshape) {
// MergeMem(Phi(...m0...), Phi:AT1(...m1...), Phi:AT2(...m2...))
PhaseIterGVN* igvn = phase->is_IterGVN();
assert(igvn != nullptr, "sanity check");
Node* hook = new Node(1);
PhiNode* new_base = (PhiNode*) clone();
// Must eagerly register phis, since they participate in loops.
igvn->register_new_node_with_optimizer(new_base);
hook->add_req(new_base);
MergeMemNode* result = MergeMemNode::make(new_base);
for (uint i = 1; i < req(); ++i) {
@ -2548,7 +2546,6 @@ Node *PhiNode::Ideal(PhaseGVN *phase, bool can_reshape) {
Node* new_phi = new_base->slice_memory(mms.adr_type(phase->C));
made_new_phi = true;
igvn->register_new_node_with_optimizer(new_phi);
hook->add_req(new_phi);
mms.set_memory(new_phi);
}
Node* phi = mms.memory();
@ -2566,19 +2563,12 @@ Node *PhiNode::Ideal(PhaseGVN *phase, bool can_reshape) {
}
}
}
// Already replace this phi node to cut it off from the graph to not interfere in dead loop checks during the
// transformations of the new phi nodes below. Otherwise, we could wrongly conclude that there is no dead loop
// because we are finding this phi node again. Also set the type of the new MergeMem node in case we are also
// visiting it in the transformations below.
igvn->replace_node(this, result);
igvn->set_type(result, result->bottom_type());
// now transform the new nodes, and return the mergemem
for (MergeMemStream mms(result); mms.next_non_empty(); ) {
Node* phi = mms.memory();
mms.set_memory(phase->transform(phi));
}
hook->destruct(igvn);
// We could immediately transform the new Phi nodes here, but that can
// result in creating an excessive number of new nodes within a single
// IGVN iteration. We have put the Phi nodes on the IGVN worklist, so
// they are transformed later on in any case.
// Replace self with the result.
return result;
}

View File

@ -1024,11 +1024,18 @@ void PhaseIterGVN::optimize() {
shuffle_worklist();
}
// The node count check in the loop below (check_node_count) assumes that we
// increase the live node count with at most
// max_live_nodes_increase_per_iteration in between checks. If this
// assumption does not hold, there is a risk that we exceed the max node
// limit in between checks and trigger an assert during node creation.
const int max_live_nodes_increase_per_iteration = NodeLimitFudgeFactor * 2;
uint loop_count = 0;
// Pull from worklist and transform the node. If the node has changed,
// update edge info and put uses on worklist.
while(_worklist.size()) {
if (C->check_node_count(NodeLimitFudgeFactor * 2, "Out of nodes")) {
while (_worklist.size() > 0) {
if (C->check_node_count(max_live_nodes_increase_per_iteration, "Out of nodes")) {
C->print_method(PHASE_AFTER_ITER_GVN, 3);
return;
}
@ -1043,7 +1050,16 @@ void PhaseIterGVN::optimize() {
if (n->outcnt() != 0) {
NOT_PRODUCT(const Type* oldtype = type_or_null(n));
// Do the transformation
DEBUG_ONLY(int live_nodes_before = C->live_nodes();)
Node* nn = transform_old(n);
DEBUG_ONLY(int live_nodes_after = C->live_nodes();)
// Ensure we did not increase the live node count with more than
// max_live_nodes_increase_per_iteration during the call to transform_old
DEBUG_ONLY(int increase = live_nodes_after - live_nodes_before;)
assert(increase < max_live_nodes_increase_per_iteration,
"excessive live node increase in single iteration of IGVN: %d "
"(should be at most %d)",
increase, max_live_nodes_increase_per_iteration);
NOT_PRODUCT(trace_PhaseIterGVN(n, nn, oldtype);)
} else if (!n->is_top()) {
remove_dead_node(n);

View File

@ -185,6 +185,7 @@ tier1_compiler_2 = \
compiler/integerArithmetic/ \
compiler/interpreter/ \
compiler/jvmci/ \
compiler/igvn/ \
-compiler/classUnloading/methodUnloading/TestOverloadCompileQueues.java \
-compiler/codecache/stress \
-compiler/codegen/aes \

View File

@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
/*
* Copyright (c) 2025, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
*
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
* accompanied this code).
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
*
* Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
* or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
* questions.
*/
/**
* @test
* @bug 8351833
* @summary Splitting Phi memory nodes through MergeMem nodes in PhiNode::Ideal
* could sometimes result in a too large number of added nodes within
* a single iteration of the main loop in PhaseIterGVN::optimize. This
* test, reduced from TestScalarReplacementMaxLiveNodes, triggers an
* assert added as part of the fix for the linked bug/issue (the
* assert naturally triggers only before the fix). The test's ability
* to trigger the issue is quite sensitive to the specific String
* constants used. The current set of chosen String constants happened
* to work particularly well.
* @run main/othervm -Xbatch
* -XX:CompileCommand=CompileOnly,compiler.igvn.TestSplitPhiThroughMergeMem::test
* compiler.igvn.TestSplitPhiThroughMergeMem
* @run main compiler.igvn.TestSplitPhiThroughMergeMem
*/
package compiler.igvn;
public class TestSplitPhiThroughMergeMem {
public static void main(String[] args) {
for (int i = 0; i < 10_000; i++) {
int val = i % 50;
test(val == 0, val % 10, val % 20);
}
}
static void test(boolean flag, int param1, int param2) {
if (flag) {
new String("tenth" + param1);
new String("eleventh" + param2);
new String("fifteenth" + param2);
new String("sixteenth" + param1);
new String("seventeenth" + param1);
new String("nineteenth" + param2);
new String("tweenth" + param1);
new String("nineth" + param1);
new String("nineth" + param1);
new String("eighteenth" + param1);
new String("abcdef" + param2);
new String("ghijklmn" + param1);
new String("ghijklmn" + param1);
}
}
}