mirror of
https://github.com/openjdk/jdk.git
synced 2026-03-20 12:53:29 +00:00
8307448: Test RedefineSharedClassJFR fail due to wrong assumption
Reviewed-by: eosterlund, coleenp
This commit is contained in:
parent
408cec516b
commit
29233e0a00
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* @test
|
||||
* @bug 8306929
|
||||
* @summary Verify clean_previous_versions when run with JFR and CDS
|
||||
* @summary Verify should_clean_previous_versions when run with JFR and CDS
|
||||
* @requires vm.jvmti
|
||||
* @requires vm.cds
|
||||
* @requires vm.hasJFR
|
||||
@ -69,19 +69,17 @@ public class RedefineSharedClassJFR {
|
||||
|
||||
if (args[0].equals("xshare-off")) {
|
||||
// First case is with -Xshare:off. In this case no classes are shared
|
||||
// and we should be able to clean out the retransformed classes. Verify
|
||||
// that the cleaning is done when the GC is triggered.
|
||||
// and we should be able to clean out the retransformed classes. There
|
||||
// is no guarantee that any classes will be in use, so just verify that
|
||||
// no classes are added due to being shared.
|
||||
List<String> offCommand = new ArrayList<>();
|
||||
offCommand.add("-Xshare:off");
|
||||
offCommand.addAll(baseCommand);
|
||||
ProcessBuilder pb = ProcessTools.createJavaProcessBuilder(offCommand);
|
||||
new OutputAnalyzer(pb.start())
|
||||
.shouldContain(SHOULD_CLEAN_TRUE)
|
||||
.shouldNotContain(SHOULD_CLEAN_FALSE)
|
||||
// We expect at least one of the transformed classes to be in use, if
|
||||
// not the above check that should_clean_previous should be true will also
|
||||
// fail. This check is to show what is expected.
|
||||
.shouldContain(SCRATCH_CLASS_ADDED_ON_STACK)
|
||||
// We can't expect any of the transformed classes to be in use
|
||||
// so the only thing we can verify is that no scratch classes
|
||||
// are added because they are shared.
|
||||
.shouldNotContain(SCRATCH_CLASS_ADDED_SHARED)
|
||||
.shouldHaveExitValue(0);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
Loading…
x
Reference in New Issue
Block a user