From b5c863b772603b3fbf159d2bd3f6d1caffaff16a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Emanuel Peter Date: Mon, 6 Nov 2023 10:41:09 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] 8316533: C2 compilation fails with assert(verify(phase)) failed: missing Value() optimization Reviewed-by: rcastanedalo, thartmann, roland --- src/hotspot/share/opto/subtypenode.cpp | 12 ++++ .../types/TestSubTypeOfAbstractClass.java | 64 +++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 76 insertions(+) create mode 100644 test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/types/TestSubTypeOfAbstractClass.java diff --git a/src/hotspot/share/opto/subtypenode.cpp b/src/hotspot/share/opto/subtypenode.cpp index 393585d453c..1011cb54245 100644 --- a/src/hotspot/share/opto/subtypenode.cpp +++ b/src/hotspot/share/opto/subtypenode.cpp @@ -43,6 +43,18 @@ const Type* SubTypeCheckNode::sub(const Type* sub_t, const Type* super_t) const if (!superklass->is_interface() && superklass->is_abstract() && !superklass->as_instance_klass()->has_subklass()) { Compile::current()->dependencies()->assert_leaf_type(superklass); + if (subk->is_same_java_type_as(superk) && !sub_t->maybe_null()) { + // The super_t has no subclasses, and sub_t has the same type and is not null, + // hence the check should always evaluate to EQ. However, this is an impossible + // situation since super_t is also abstract, and hence sub_t cannot have the + // same type and be non-null. + // Still, if the non-static method of an abstract class without subclasses is + // force-compiled, the Param0 has the self/this pointer with NotNull. This + // method would now never be called, because of the leaf-type dependency. Hence, + // just for consistency with verification, we return EQ. + return TypeInt::CC_EQ; + } + // subk is either a supertype of superk, or null. In either case, superk is a subtype. return TypeInt::CC_GT; } } diff --git a/test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/types/TestSubTypeOfAbstractClass.java b/test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/types/TestSubTypeOfAbstractClass.java new file mode 100644 index 00000000000..63274b86e72 --- /dev/null +++ b/test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/types/TestSubTypeOfAbstractClass.java @@ -0,0 +1,64 @@ +/* + * Copyright (c) 2023, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved. + * DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER. + * + * This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it + * under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as + * published by the Free Software Foundation. Oracle designates this + * particular file as subject to the "Classpath" exception as provided + * by Oracle in the LICENSE file that accompanied this code. + * + * This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License + * version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that + * accompanied this code). + * + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version + * 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, + * Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA. + * + * Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA + * or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any + * questions. + */ + +/** + * @test + * @bug 8316533 + * @summary Oop of abstract class A with no subclass is subtype checked after null-check + * @run driver compiler.types.TestSubTypeOfAbstractClass + */ + +/** + * @test + * @bug 8316533 + * @summary Oop of abstract class A is subtype checked after null-check + * @requires vm.compiler2.enabled + * @run main/othervm -XX:CompileCommand=compileonly,*A::test + * -Xcomp -XX:+IgnoreUnrecognizedVMOptions -XX:+StressReflectiveCode + * compiler.types.TestSubTypeOfAbstractClass + */ + +package compiler.types; + +public class TestSubTypeOfAbstractClass { + + abstract class A { + public static A get_null() { + return null; + } + + public static boolean test() { + // NullCheck -> CastPP with type A:NotNull + // But A is abstract with no subclass, hence this type is impossible + return get_null() instanceof A; + } + } + + public static void main(String[] args) { + for (int i = 0; i < 10_000; i++ ) { + A.test(); + } + } +}