From bb1f8a1698553d5962569ac8912edd0d7ef010dd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Xiaolong Peng Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2024 20:10:27 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] 8335904: Fix invalid comment in ShenandoahLock Reviewed-by: shade --- src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahLock.cpp | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahLock.cpp b/src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahLock.cpp index 6fc74c53e63..63c6c9ea886 100644 --- a/src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahLock.cpp +++ b/src/hotspot/share/gc/shenandoah/shenandoahLock.cpp @@ -44,7 +44,7 @@ void ShenandoahLock::contended_lock(bool allow_block_for_safepoint) { template void ShenandoahLock::contended_lock_internal(JavaThread* java_thread) { assert(!ALLOW_BLOCK || java_thread != nullptr, "Must have a Java thread when allowing block."); - // Spin this much on multi-processor, do not spin on multi-processor. + // Spin this much, but only on multi-processor systems. int ctr = os::is_MP() ? 0xFF : 0; // Apply TTAS to avoid more expensive CAS calls if the lock is still held by other thread. while (Atomic::load(&_state) == locked ||