From e5d4746fb471416a7b89f6c7d2e70b172def494a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chris Hegarty <chegar@openjdk.org>
Date: Thu, 17 Feb 2011 09:56:38 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] 7017901: OOME in
 java/util/concurrent/BlockingQueue/CancelledProducerConsumerLoops.java

Unbounded queues should be disabled in the test

Reviewed-by: alanb
---
 .../BlockingQueue/CancelledProducerConsumerLoops.java         | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/BlockingQueue/CancelledProducerConsumerLoops.java b/jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/BlockingQueue/CancelledProducerConsumerLoops.java
index 34f0722d8bd..755ff9c2d97 100644
--- a/jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/BlockingQueue/CancelledProducerConsumerLoops.java
+++ b/jdk/test/java/util/concurrent/BlockingQueue/CancelledProducerConsumerLoops.java
@@ -124,11 +124,11 @@ public class CancelledProducerConsumerLoops {
         oneRun(new ArrayBlockingQueue<Integer>(CAPACITY), pairs, iters);
         oneRun(new LinkedBlockingQueue<Integer>(CAPACITY), pairs, iters);
         oneRun(new LinkedBlockingDeque<Integer>(CAPACITY), pairs, iters);
-        oneRun(new LinkedTransferQueue<Integer>(), pairs, iters);
         oneRun(new SynchronousQueue<Integer>(), pairs, iters / 8);
 
-        /* PriorityBlockingQueue is unbounded
+        /* unbounded queue implementations are prone to OOME
         oneRun(new PriorityBlockingQueue<Integer>(iters / 2 * pairs), pairs, iters / 4);
+        oneRun(new LinkedTransferQueue<Integer>(), pairs, iters);
         */
     }