jdk/test/hotspot/jtreg/compiler/rangechecks/TestFoldComparesFuzzer.java
2026-06-01 06:56:33 +00:00

729 lines
31 KiB
Java

/*
* Copyright (c) 2025, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All rights reserved.
* DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.
*
* This code is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License version 2 only, as
* published by the Free Software Foundation.
*
* This code is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT
* ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
* FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU General Public License
* version 2 for more details (a copy is included in the LICENSE file that
* accompanied this code).
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License version
* 2 along with this work; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
* Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA.
*
* Please contact Oracle, 500 Oracle Parkway, Redwood Shores, CA 94065 USA
* or visit www.oracle.com if you need additional information or have any
* questions.
*/
/*
* @test
* @bug 8346420
* @summary Fuzz patterns for IfNode::fold_compares_helper
* @modules java.base/jdk.internal.misc
* @library /test/lib /
* @compile ../lib/ir_framework/TestFramework.java
* @compile ../lib/generators/Generators.java
* @compile ../lib/verify/Verify.java
* @run driver ${test.main.class}
*/
package compiler.rangechecks;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Random;
import java.util.HashSet;
import java.util.Set;
import jdk.test.lib.Utils;
import compiler.lib.compile_framework.*;
import compiler.lib.generators.*;
import compiler.lib.template_framework.Template;
import compiler.lib.template_framework.TemplateToken;
import static compiler.lib.template_framework.Template.scope;
import static compiler.lib.template_framework.Template.let;
import static compiler.lib.template_framework.Template.$;
import compiler.lib.template_framework.library.TestFrameworkClass;
/**
* For more basic examples, see TestFoldCompares.java
*
* I'm only covering some basic cases to test the fundamental
* logic inside IfNode::fold_compares_helper.
* - TestMethodGeneratorConstIR does extensive result and IR verification
* for the cases a-d) in IfNode::fold_compares_helper, but only with
* constant lo and hi.
* - Other test generators currently don't have IR rules, but check
* correctness in various relevant scenarios I came across during
* the bugfix of JDK-8346420.
* - I'm also mixing signed and unsigned comparisons, just to ensure
* the less often used (and tested) unsigned comparisons don't slip
* through the cracks.
*
* In the future, we could add more cases:
* - Extend to long - though the optimization does not yet cover longs anyway.
* - More IR rules: difficult to make stable. Not all permutations are covered
* by the optimizations, edge-cases could make IR rules brittle.
*/
public class TestFoldComparesFuzzer {
private static final Random RANDOM = Utils.getRandomInstance();
private static final RestrictableGenerator<Integer> INT_GEN = Generators.G.ints();
public static void main(String[] args) {
// Create a new CompileFramework instance.
CompileFramework comp = new CompileFramework();
long t0 = System.nanoTime();
// Add a java source file.
comp.addJavaSourceCode("compiler.rangecheck.templated.Generated", generate(comp));
long t1 = System.nanoTime();
// Compile the source file.
comp.compile();
long t2 = System.nanoTime();
// Run the tests without any additional VM flags.
comp.invoke("compiler.rangecheck.templated.Generated", "main", new Object[] {new String[] {}});
long t3 = System.nanoTime();
System.out.println("Code Generation: " + (t1-t0) * 1e-9f);
System.out.println("Code Compilation: " + (t2-t1) * 1e-9f);
System.out.println("Running Tests: " + (t3-t2) * 1e-9f);
}
public static String generate(CompileFramework comp) {
// Create a list to collect all tests.
List<TemplateToken> testTemplateTokens = new ArrayList<>();
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
testTemplateTokens.add(generateTest(/* no warmup, like -Xcomp */ 0));
}
for (int i = 0; i < 5; i++) {
testTemplateTokens.add(generateTest(/* with warmup, slower */ 10_000));
}
// Create the test class, which runs all testTemplateTokens.
return TestFrameworkClass.render(
// package and class name.
"compiler.rangecheck.templated", "Generated",
// List of imports.
Set.of("compiler.lib.generators.*",
"compiler.lib.verify.*",
"java.util.Random",
"jdk.test.lib.Utils"),
// classpath, so the Test VM has access to the compiled class files.
comp.getEscapedClassPathOfCompiledClasses(),
// The list of tests.
testTemplateTokens);
}
enum Comparator {
// TODO: enable again after JDK-8385157
// ULT(" < 0", false),
// ULE(" <= 0", false),
// UGT(" > 0", false),
// UGE(" >= 0", false),
// UEQ(" == 0", false),
// UNE(" != 0", false),
LT(" < ", true),
LE(" <= ", true),
GT(" > ", true),
GE(" >= ", true),
EQ(" == ", true),
NE(" != ", true);
private final String token;
private final boolean signed;
Comparator(String token, boolean signed) {
this.token = token;
this.signed = signed;
}
public String getToken() {
return token;
}
public boolean isSigned() {
return signed;
}
public Comparator negate() {
return switch(this) {
// TODO: enable again after JDK-8385157
// case ULT -> UGE;
// case ULE -> UGT;
// case UGT -> ULE;
// case UGE -> ULT;
// case UEQ -> UNE;
// case UNE -> UEQ;
case LT -> GE;
case LE -> GT;
case GT -> LE;
case GE -> LT;
case EQ -> NE;
case NE -> EQ;
};
}
public Comparator flip() {
return switch(this) {
// TODO: enable again after JDK-8385157
// case ULT -> UGT;
// case ULE -> UGE;
// case UGT -> ULT;
// case UGE -> ULE;
// case UEQ -> UEQ;
// case UNE -> UNE;
case LT -> GT;
case LE -> GE;
case GT -> LT;
case GE -> LE;
case EQ -> EQ;
case NE -> NE;
};
}
static Comparator random() {
return values()[RANDOM.nextInt(values().length)];
}
static Comparator randomGreater() {
return RANDOM.nextBoolean() ? GE : GT;
}
static Comparator randomLess() {
return RANDOM.nextBoolean() ? LE : LT;
}
}
record Comparison(String lhs, Comparator cmp, String rhs, boolean negated) {
public Comparison(String lhs, Comparator cmp, String rhs) {
this(lhs, cmp, rhs, false);
}
public String toString() {
return cmp.isSigned()
? ((negated ? "!" : "") + "(" + lhs + " "+ cmp.getToken() + " " + rhs + ")")
: ((negated ? "!" : "") + "(Integer.compareUnsigned(" + lhs + ", " + rhs + ")" + cmp.getToken() + ")");
}
// Keep the same semantics of the test, but change its form.
Comparison permuteRandom() {
return flipRandom().complementRandom();
}
Comparison flipRandom() {
return RANDOM.nextBoolean() ? this : new Comparison(rhs, cmp.flip(), lhs);
}
Comparison complementRandom() {
return RANDOM.nextBoolean() ? this : new Comparison(lhs, cmp.negate(), rhs, true);
}
Comparison negateCmp() {
return new Comparison(lhs, cmp.negate(), rhs, negated);
}
}
interface TestMethodGenerator {
Template.OneArg<String> getTestTemplate();
default Template.ZeroArgs getIRTemplate(boolean withWarmup) {
return Template.make(() -> scope("// No IR rule.\n"));
}
default Template.ZeroArgs getInputTemplate() {
return Template.make(() -> scope(
"""
RestrictableGenerator<Integer> gen = Generators.G.ints();
int n = gen.next();
int a = gen.next();
int b = gen.next();
"""
));
};
}
// Some basic ranges with constant bounds.
// This should test some basic correctness, and also covers the case
// of bug JDK-8135069.
static class TestMethodGeneratorConst implements TestMethodGenerator {
private final int con1 = INT_GEN.next();
private final int con2 = INT_GEN.next();
private final Comparison c1 = new Comparison("n", Comparator.random(), "con1").permuteRandom();
private final Comparison c2 = new Comparison("n", Comparator.random(), "con2").permuteRandom();
private final Template.OneArg<String> testTemplate = Template.make("methodName", (String methodName) -> scope(
let("con1", con1),
let("con2", con2),
let("c1", c1),
let("c2", c2),
"""
static boolean #methodName(int n, int a, int b) {
int con1 = #con1;
int con2 = #con2;
if (#c1 || #c2) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
"""
));
public Template.OneArg<String> getTestTemplate() { return testTemplate; }
}
// Cases where a and b are ranges that touch min_int/max_int.
// Note: if con1=0 and con2=1 then this is like the cases:
// - test_Case3a_LTLE_overflow
// - test_Case3b_LTLE_overflow
// - test_Case4a_LELE_assert
//
// Hence, I think this test gives us quite good coverage for the kinds of bugs
// such as JDK-8346420.
static class TestMethodGeneratorWithIf implements TestMethodGenerator {
private final int con1 = INT_GEN.next();
private final int con2 = INT_GEN.next();
private final String m1 = RANDOM.nextBoolean() ? "Integer.MIN_VALUE" : "Integer.MAX_VALUE";
private final String m2 = RANDOM.nextBoolean() ? "Integer.MIN_VALUE" : "Integer.MAX_VALUE";
private final Comparison c1 = new Comparison("n", Comparator.random(), "a").permuteRandom();
private final Comparison c2 = new Comparison("n", Comparator.random(), "b").permuteRandom();
private final Template.OneArg<String> testTemplate = Template.make("methodName", (String methodName) -> scope(
let("con1", con1),
let("con2", con2),
let("m1", m1),
let("m2", m2),
let("c1", c1),
let("c2", c2),
"""
static boolean #methodName(int n, int a, int b) {
if (a < b) {
a = #con1;
b = #con2;
} else {
a = #m1;
b = #m2;
}
if (#c1 || #c2) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
"""
));
public Template.OneArg<String> getTestTemplate() { return testTemplate; }
}
// Just for good practice: add some case where the ranges are more free.
static class TestMethodGeneratorRanges implements TestMethodGenerator {
private final int n_hi = INT_GEN.next();
private final int n_lo = INT_GEN.next();
private final int a_hi = INT_GEN.next();
private final int a_lo = INT_GEN.next();
private final int b_hi = INT_GEN.next();
private final int b_lo = INT_GEN.next();
private final Comparison c1 = new Comparison("n", Comparator.random(), "a").permuteRandom();
private final Comparison c2 = new Comparison("n", Comparator.random(), "b").permuteRandom();
private final Template.OneArg<String> template = Template.make("methodName", (String methodName) -> scope(
let("n_hi", n_hi),
let("n_lo", n_lo),
let("a_hi", a_hi),
let("a_lo", a_lo),
let("b_hi", b_hi),
let("b_lo", b_lo),
let("c1", c1),
let("c2", c2),
"""
static boolean #methodName(int n, int a, int b) {
n = Math.min(#n_hi, Math.max(#n_lo, n));
a = Math.min(#a_hi, Math.max(#a_lo, a));
b = Math.min(#b_hi, Math.max(#b_lo, b));
if (#c1 || #c2) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
"""
));
public Template.OneArg<String> getTestTemplate() {
return template;
}
}
// Generate some more constrained cases, but with IR rules
static class TestMethodGeneratorConstIR implements TestMethodGenerator {
private final int lo;
private final int hi;
{ // instance initializer
// We want to cover all cases for lo and hi combinations. But the
// critical cases happen around int_min and int_max, and when
// lo and hi are close to each other.
switch (RANDOM.nextInt(3)) {
case 0 -> {
// Full freedom, will eventually cover all cases
lo = INT_GEN.next();
hi = INT_GEN.next();
}
case 1 -> {
// Pick cases around overflow and underflow
lo = Integer.MAX_VALUE - 5 + RANDOM.nextInt(10);
hi = Integer.MAX_VALUE - 5 + RANDOM.nextInt(10);
}
default -> {
// Pick cases where lo and hi are close to each other
lo = INT_GEN.next();
hi = lo - 5 + RANDOM.nextInt(10);
}
}
}
// Since we are using constants for lo and hi, the checks should get canonicalized,
// so that n is always in the lhs. We only create cases that are covered by the
// 4 cases of "2 CmpI -> 1 CmpU" optimization in IfNode::fold_compares_helper.
private final Comparison c_lo = new Comparison("n", Comparator.randomGreater(), "lo");
private final Comparison c_hi = new Comparison("n", Comparator.randomLess(), "hi");
private final boolean swap = RANDOM.nextBoolean();
private final Comparison c1Permuted = (swap ? c_lo : c_hi).permuteRandom();
private final Comparison c2Permuted = (swap ? c_hi : c_lo).permuteRandom();
// n > lo && n < hi -> check for inside range
// n <= lo || n >= hi -> chedk for outside range
private final boolean withAnd = RANDOM.nextBoolean();
private final String operator = withAnd ? "&&" : "||";
private final Comparison c1 = withAnd ? c1Permuted : c1Permuted.negateCmp();
private final Comparison c2 = withAnd ? c2Permuted : c2Permuted.negateCmp();
private final Template.OneArg<String> testTemplate = Template.make("methodName", (String methodName) -> scope(
let("lo", lo),
let("hi", hi),
let("c1", c1),
let("c2", c2),
let("op", operator),
"""
static boolean #methodName(int n, int a, int b) {
int lo = #lo;
int hi = #hi;
if (#c1 #op #c2) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
"""
));
public Template.OneArg<String> getTestTemplate() { return testTemplate; }
public Template.ZeroArgs getIRTemplate(boolean withWarmup) {
return Template.make(() -> {
String cmpIParse, cmpUParse, cmpIFinal, cmpUFinal;
String comment;
// If both branches are compiled (in -Xcomp mode, i.e. no warmup), then
// we can know very precisely what happens in each case.
if (c_lo.cmp() == Comparator.GT && c_hi.cmp() == Comparator.LT) {
// a) (n > lo && n < hi)
if (lo == Integer.MAX_VALUE || hi == Integer.MIN_VALUE) {
cmpIParse = "< 2"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "< 2"; cmpUFinal = "= 0";
comment = "a) one or both checks fold at parse time";
} else if (lo < hi && lo+2 == hi) {
// Not yet folded at parsing, because lo != hi
// BoolNode::Ideal: x <u 1 or x <=u 0 -> x==0 (signed)
cmpIParse = "= 2"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "= 1"; cmpUFinal = "= 0";
comment = "a) replace with CmpU (single element) -> CmpI eq";
} else if (lo < hi && lo+1 == hi) {
// Not yet folded at parsing, because lo != hi
cmpIParse = "= 2"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "= 0"; cmpUFinal = "= 0";
comment = "a) impossible condition (exact) -> fold away";
} else if (lo < hi) {
cmpIParse = "= 2"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "= 0"; cmpUFinal = "= 1";
comment = "a) replace with CmpU (non-empty)";
} else if (lo == hi) {
// same CmpI at parse time
cmpIParse = "= 1"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "= 0"; cmpUFinal = "= 0";
comment = "a) impossible condition -> fold away";
} else {
cmpIParse = "= 2"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "= 0"; cmpUFinal = "= 0";
comment = "a) impossible condition -> fold away";
}
} else if (c_lo.cmp() == Comparator.GT && c_hi.cmp() == Comparator.LE) {
// b) (n > lo && n <= hi)
if (lo == Integer.MAX_VALUE || hi == Integer.MAX_VALUE) {
cmpIParse = "< 2"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "< 2"; cmpUFinal = "= 0";
comment = "b) one or both checks fold at parse time";
} else if (lo < hi && lo+1 == hi) {
// BoolNode::Ideal: x <u 1 or x <=u 0 -> x==0 (signed)
cmpIParse = "= 2"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "= 1"; cmpUFinal = "= 0";
comment = "b) replace with CmpU (single element) -> CmpI eq";
} else if (lo < hi && lo+1 < hi) {
cmpIParse = "= 2"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "= 0"; cmpUFinal = "= 1";
comment = "b) replace with CmpU (non-empty)";
} else if (lo == hi) {
cmpIParse = "= 1"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "= 0"; cmpUFinal = "= 0";
comment = "b) impossible condition (exact) -> fold away";
} else {
cmpIParse = "= 2"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "= 0"; cmpUFinal = "= 0";
comment = "b) impossible condition -> fold away";
}
} else if (c_lo.cmp() == Comparator.GE && c_hi.cmp() == Comparator.LT) {
// c) (n >= lo && n < hi)
if (lo == Integer.MIN_VALUE || hi == Integer.MIN_VALUE) {
cmpIParse = "< 2"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "< 2"; cmpUFinal = "= 0";
comment = "c) one or both checks fold at parse time";
} else if (lo < hi && lo+1 == hi) {
// BoolNode::Ideal: x <u 1 or x <=u 0 -> x==0 (signed)
cmpIParse = "= 2"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "= 1"; cmpUFinal = "= 0";
comment = "c) replace with CmpU (single element) -> CmpI eq";
} else if (lo < hi && lo+1 < hi) {
cmpIParse = "= 2"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "= 0"; cmpUFinal = "= 1";
comment = "c) replace with CmpU (non-empty)";
} else if (lo == hi) {
// RegionNode::optimize_trichotomy: can fold (n >= x && n < x) -> never
cmpIParse = "< 2"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "= 0"; cmpUFinal = "= 0";
comment = "c) impossible condition (exact) -> fold away";
} else {
cmpIParse = "= 2"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "= 0"; cmpUFinal = "= 0";
comment = "c) impossible condition -> fold away";
}
} else if (c_lo.cmp() == Comparator.GE && c_hi.cmp() == Comparator.LE) {
// d) (n >= lo && n <= hi)
if (lo == Integer.MIN_VALUE || hi == Integer.MAX_VALUE) {
cmpIParse = "< 2"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "< 2"; cmpUFinal = "= 0";
comment = "d) one or both checks fold at parse time";
} else if (lo == hi) {
// same CmpI at parse time
// BoolNode::Ideal: x <u 1 or x <=u 0 -> x==0 (signed)
cmpIParse = "= 1"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "= 1"; cmpUFinal = "= 0";
comment = "d) replace with CmpU (single element) -> CmpI eq";
} else if (lo < hi) {
cmpIParse = "= 2"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "= 0"; cmpUFinal = "= 1";
comment = "d) replace with CmpU (non-empty)";
} else {
cmpIParse = "= 2"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "= 0"; cmpUFinal = "= 0";
comment = "d) impossible condition -> fold away";
}
} else {
throw new RuntimeException("should not be generated: " + c_lo + " and " + c_hi);
}
// All the precise counting above assumes that both ifs get compiled, and hence
// both CmpI are generated. Further, it assumes that both of the "or" branches
// (fail1 and fail2) end up "in the same place": either at the same region, or
// both in an uncommon trap. With profiling, the following cases are possible:
// - The first if is constant folded to fail1, and we have no CmpI nor CmpU
// in the graph.
// - The first if always leads to fail1, and away from the second if, and so we
// only have a single CmpI in the graph after parsing.
// - The first if always leads towards the second if, and away from fail1. And
// the second if always points towards fail2 and away from succ. We get an
// uncommon trap for fail1 and succ, and only the fail2 path is compiled.
// Hence, we have two CmpI, but fail1 and fail2 do not end up "in the same place".
// This makes our IR rule quite weak, sadly. We could make the IR rules stronger,
// but we would need to control warmup, and generate corresponding inputs that
// ensure the right paths are compiled or not compiled.
if (withWarmup) {
cmpIParse = "<= 2"; cmpUParse = "= 0"; cmpIFinal = "<= 2"; cmpUFinal = "< 2";
comment = "with warmup: unstable-if makes precise counting hard.";
}
return scope(
let("IP", cmpIParse),
let("UP", cmpUParse),
let("IF", cmpIFinal),
let("UF", cmpUFinal),
let("comment", comment),
"""
// #comment
@IR(counts = {IRNode.CMP_I, "#IP", IRNode.CMP_U, "#UP"}, phase = CompilePhase.AFTER_PARSING)
@IR(counts = {IRNode.CMP_I, "#IF", IRNode.CMP_U, "#UF"})
"""
);
});
}
@Override
public Template.ZeroArgs getInputTemplate() {
return Template.make(() -> scope(
let("lo", lo),
let("hi", hi),
"""
Random r = Utils.getRandomInstance();
RestrictableGenerator<Integer> gen = Generators.G.ints();
int a = gen.next();
int b = gen.next();
""",
switch (RANDOM.nextInt(9)) {
// Random values
case 0 -> "int n = gen.next();\n";
// Fuzz around specific values
case 1 -> "int n = r.nextInt(10) - 5 + #lo;\n";
case 2 -> "int n = r.nextInt(10) - 5 + #hi;\n";
case 3 -> "int n = r.nextInt(10) - 5 + (r.nextBoolean() ? #lo : #hi);\n";
case 4 -> "int n = r.nextInt(10) - 5 + Integer.MAX_VALUE;\n";
// Only very low or very high values, or in the middle
case 5 -> "int n = r.nextInt(10) - 10 + Integer.MAX_VALUE;\n";
case 6 -> "int n = r.nextInt(10) + Integer.MIN_VALUE;\n";
case 7 -> "int n = r.nextInt(10) - 5 + #lo/2 + #hi/2;\n";
// Always the same constant
default -> "int n = " + INT_GEN.next() + ";\n";
}
));
};
}
// switch cases can also be implemented with range checks using
// constants, and then we can optimize 2 CmpI with a single CmpU,
// at least in some cases.
static class TestMethodGeneratorSwitch implements TestMethodGenerator {
Set<Short> cases = new HashSet<>();
{ // instance initializer
int n = RANDOM.nextInt(1, 20);
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
cases.add((short)(int)INT_GEN.next());
}
}
private final Template.OneArg<String> testTemplate = Template.make("methodName", (String methodName) -> scope(
"""
static boolean #methodName(int n, int a, int b) {
switch((short)n) {
""",
cases.stream().map(i -> scope(
let("i", i),
"""
case (short)#i:
"""
)).toList(),
"""
return true;
default:
return false;
}
}
"""
));
public Template.OneArg<String> getTestTemplate() { return testTemplate; }
}
// If arr.length is in the second check, the null-check for arr
// is located between the two checks.
// I'm not adding any IR rules here, just checking for correctness.
static class TestMethodGeneratorArrLength implements TestMethodGenerator {
private final int n_hi = INT_GEN.next();
private final int n_lo = INT_GEN.next();
private final int a_hi = INT_GEN.next();
private final int a_lo = INT_GEN.next();
private final int size = INT_GEN.restricted(0, 100_000).next();
// Get checks like: n < a || n >= arr.length
private final Comparison c_lo = new Comparison("n", Comparator.random(), "a").permuteRandom();
private final Comparison c_hi = new Comparison("n", Comparator.random(), "arr.length").permuteRandom();
private final boolean swap = RANDOM.nextBoolean();
private final Comparison c1Permuted = (swap ? c_lo : c_hi).permuteRandom();
private final Comparison c2Permuted = (swap ? c_hi : c_lo).permuteRandom();
// n > lo && n < hi -> check for inside range
// n <= lo || n >= hi -> chedk for outside range
private final boolean withAnd = RANDOM.nextBoolean();
private final String operator = withAnd ? "&&" : "||";
private final Comparison c1 = withAnd ? c1Permuted : c1Permuted.negateCmp();
private final Comparison c2 = withAnd ? c2Permuted : c2Permuted.negateCmp();
private final Template.OneArg<String> testTemplate = Template.make("methodName", (String methodName) -> scope(
let("n_hi", n_hi),
let("n_lo", n_lo),
let("a_hi", a_hi),
let("a_lo", a_lo),
let("size", size),
let("c1", c1),
let("c2", c2),
let("op", operator),
"""
static boolean #methodName(int n, int a, int b) {
int[] arr = $arr;
n = Math.min(#n_hi, Math.max(#n_lo, n));
a = Math.min(#a_hi, Math.max(#a_lo, a));
if (#c1 #op #c2) {
return true;
}
return false;
}
static int[] $arr = new int[#size];
"""
));
public Template.OneArg<String> getTestTemplate() { return testTemplate; }
}
public static TemplateToken generateTest(int warmup) {
TestMethodGenerator tg = switch(RANDOM.nextInt(6)) {
case 0 -> new TestMethodGeneratorConst();
case 1 -> new TestMethodGeneratorWithIf();
case 2 -> new TestMethodGeneratorRanges();
case 3 -> new TestMethodGeneratorConstIR();
case 4 -> new TestMethodGeneratorSwitch();
case 5 -> new TestMethodGeneratorArrLength();
default -> throw new RuntimeException("not expected");
};
Template.ZeroArgs testInputTemplate = tg.getInputTemplate();
Template.OneArg<String> testMethodTemplate = tg.getTestTemplate();
Template.ZeroArgs testIRTemplate = tg.getIRTemplate(warmup >= 10_000);
var testTemplate = Template.make(() -> scope(
let("warmup", warmup / 100),
"""
// --- $test start ---
@Run(test = "$test")
@Warmup(#warmup)
public static void $run() {
for (int i = 0; i < 100; i++) {
// Generate random values for n, a, b.
""",
testInputTemplate.asToken(),
"""
// Run test and compare with interpreter results.
var result = $test(n, a, b);
var expected = $reference(n, a, b);
if (result != expected) {
throw new RuntimeException("wrong result: " + result + " vs " + expected
+ "\\nn: " + n
+ "\\na: " + a
+ "\\nb: " + b);
}
}
}
@Test
""",
testIRTemplate.asToken(),
testMethodTemplate.asToken($("test")),
"""
@DontCompile
""",
testMethodTemplate.asToken($("reference")),
"""
// --- $test end ---
"""
));
return testTemplate.asToken();
}
}